<<I’m homosexual. I would want to marry the man I love and adopt children. Why are not we helped by the law? The homosexuality is a normal way to be, not an illness not even a perversion. Why do we continue to be discriminated?>> Why do you homosexuals discriminate the heterosexuals? Isn’t it? Try […]
<<I’m homosexual. I would want to marry the man I love and adopt children. Why are not we helped by the law? The homosexuality is a normal way to be, not an illness not even a perversion. Why do we continue to be discriminated?>>
Why do you homosexuals discriminate the heterosexuals? Isn’t it? Try to think. The world went upside down not because the homosexuality today is openly declared, but because the thought and expression freedom doesn’t exist anymore for the heterosexuals. If the homosexuality is not an illness, today the heterosexuality seems to be that. If I affirm to not share, immediately I’m put to silence for homophobia, discrimination, sexual racism, in this spreading goodness hypocritical, which in reality often has more political taste than true representation of human goodness.
I’ll tell you in any case all what I think.
Despite of it is absolutely true the homosexuality is not an illness, not even a depravation, I consider it an anomaly. The sexual and amorous propensity, as it is expressed in the human world, doesn’t exist among the other animals. When I say “exist” I just mean the expression in its full and overall linguistic semantic value of the significant and significance. The stickleback fish –which is often indicated as example- is not homosexual, but adapts its livery to the fries defense. The bonobo monkey has not real homosexual behaviours. This primate adopts behaviours of reciprocal sexuality discharging the aggressive tension which unavoidably grows up in narrow groups, but the reproductive copula happens among males and females.
We intend the human homosexuality as an whole of sexual and affective attraction, pair to what happens between a man and a woman. Well, this doesn’t exist in general in the animal world. Someone could object that neither the bonobos fall in love, but it is established the mammals feel and attachment similar to our feeling, something going over the territorial protection and the reproduction instinct.
Now, you’ll agree with me that if in the universe known to us the species reproduction always and only happens through female ovule cells and male gametes (in the hermaphrodites too), this must be the natural order of things. I didn’t make it in this way, I didn’t decide it. Therefore a good time let’s abandon to try to justify the human behaviour looking for not existing scientific explanations for a comfort!
I consider the heterosexuality the natural order of events and will affirm this until the days end, in front of whom who will try to muzzle or give an epithet to me with some adjective.
But, and in this I’m as much sincere, I can affirm to you with firmness that if you are homosexual I’ll always respect you. Not as a sick, not as a depraved.
I abhor and contrast the evil, the badness, who abuses and torments not human animals. On these things I have no pity not even forgiveness at all.
If you are a good man and don’t find amusement to hurt a dog along the street, what does it mean to me if you prefer men to women? I neither have too many restrictions regarding marriages among people of the same sex, even if I feel it is anomalous.
Don’t ask me however to approve the children adoption, because to this I answer a hard no! why? Because a child has the sacrosanct right to grow up with the maternal and paternal figures by his side, the one providing strength and integrity characteristics to him, the other sweetness and love. The child had the right to know which is the natural order wanted in the universe known to us. His sexual choice will be taken later and freely, but to deprive him since the beginning one of the two figures for me this is an abomination towards his rights. Unfortunately life is so unfair. Sometime we lose a parent because events strip him from us prematurely. But at least we don’t have to cause this without sense damage. Leave a child the freedom to choose by himself, without imposing since he is an infant that a normal family has to be homosexual. You have certainly grown up in a family constituted by father and mother. I even understand they can have manifested disagreement against your choices, but this has not varied your inclinations.
Leave the same freedom to all children. And leave that children are adopted by families with two parents and not one only. This is also disapproving.
I will always profess your full individuality and your right to express your sexual belief. I’ll be by your side if you’ll suffer for love or for the others malvagity and will be the first to defend you.
Will you do the same for me?